Tree Loss in Atlanta

Click below for flyer:

final flyer - picture

Sticky Notes

Click below for transcripts of public feedback to Draft Ordinance Outline:

development standards - sticky note board

How Can You Help?

Join us in advocating for the trees in your neighborhood!
Please check out what volunteer needs we have and email us at info@treenextdoor.org for more information on how to get involved.

About Our Name

We call ourselves “The Tree Next Door” because we have found that people are most concerned about the tree next door to them that is marked to be cut down, not a tree on the other side of town which they never see. Because community concern tends to be strongest at the neighborhood level, it's important to have advocates all over the city who speak up for the trees where they live.

fall tree through window

latest news flash

 

Tree Removal Trends

This analysis includes trees on private property only, which are managed by the Arborist Division. Does not include trees on public property, which are managed by the Department of Parks and Recreation.

(Click on the picture below for an expanded view.)

number of permitted trees - by type

More Trees Than Ever Before Are Being Removed as DDH
(Dead, Dying or Hazardous)  

Approximately half of all trees removed each year are designated as DDH, which means the property owner does not have to replace or pay recompense for them. Last quarter, the percentage of trees removed as DDH was 57%, the highest it's ever been. The average DBH (diameter at breast height) of a DDH-removed tree is 21.8 inches, a size that has remained fairly consistent since FY 2014.

DDH-removed trees are often associated with building permits, in which developers are able to avoid replacement or recompense fees for any trees labeled DDH on their site plans. The City has yet to provide DDH tree removal data by area of town, although we can see in Accela that the largest percentage of DDH applications are filed in zip codes where construction is considerably higher (i.e., zip codes 30305, 30327 accounted for 25% of DDH applications filed this past quarter, with zip codes 30318, 30306, and 30342 accounting for the next 25% of DDH applications.) While we are told by the City Arborist that the number of DDH trees and the reasons they were approved as DDH are in Accela, the City's online permitting database, for each DDH permit, this information is "turned off" for public view.  All we can see is the DDH information that a permit applicant may, on occasion, provide as part of their tree removal application, but this, of course, is the permit applicant's own assessment of the trees the applicant wants removed as DDH.

Additionally, the City does not track which trees DDH-removed trees were actually "saved" trees from a previous construction project, but ended up dying within a few years due to lack of tree protection during the construction phase (i.e., improperly located or maintained tree fencing).  Nor does it track DDH trees that were "replaced" trees from prior construction projects, but failed to thrive long-term.  And finally, the City does not track DDH trees that are removed shortly before a developer files a building permit.

Illegally Cut Trees More Than Doubled Last Year

As with all law enforcement issues, it is never clear whether a spike in violations of the law means that crime is up or if law enforcement officers are doing a better job at catching the crooks. What we do know is that illegal tree removal has been slowly increasing over the past few years, and dramatically increased in FY 2019.  And the size of the average tree cut illegally jumped up to 20.2 inches this past quarter from an average of 17.3 inches over the previous six years. Therefore, it's clear that enforcement penalties in the tree ordinance need to be strengthened.  We are losing more trees and bigger trees due to weak penalties in the tree ordinance.

Legally Cut Trees Are Increasing, Too!

Not surprisingly, more trees than ever are being removed legally, 95% of them are associated with plan reviews for building permits.  Last fiscal year, 7,755 trees healthy trees were legally removed, averaging 15.8 inches in DBH.  We expect 8,400 more healthy trees to be removed legally this year.  The tree ordinance only requires replaced trees to be 2.5 inches in caliper (DBH), so even when a tree is replaced, the tree canopy is not.

As the number of building permits increase in the City of Atlanta, so do the number of healthy trees permitted for removal.  Until the City starts insisting on some zoning and building standards that preserve healthy trees, as opposed to allowing developers to automatically maximize their buildable area, we can expect to continue to lose thousands of trees each year.  It won't be long before 10,000 or more healthy trees being cut down each year in the City of Atlanta becomes the norm. 

Overall Net Tree Loss  ("Houston, we have a problem.")

In FY 2019 we lost nearly 16,000 trees total.  We project to lose 17,400 more trees this coming year. 

And what's more, they are not getting replaced. We suffered a total net loss of 9,228 trees last year (FY 2019).  Over the past two years, we've only been replacing 60% of the total trees lost.

(Click on the picture below for an expanded view.)

trees lost and replaced

 Problem is, size matters!  Replacement trees are but just a fraction of the size of the trees that are coming down.  93% of the total tree DBH inches removed these past two years were not replaced.

(Click on the picture below for an expanded view.)

inches lost and replaced

Folks, we can't replant our way out of this!  We need a new tree ordinance that does more than specify how tree removal permits will be assessed recompense, which is all the City Planning tree ordinance consultants seemed to be concerned about at the November 6 Tree Ordinance Rewrite Community Meeting.  We need a tree ordinance that saves our existing tree canopy before it's gone for good. 

Every month this tree ordinance rewrite drags on we are losing over 1,300 trees and the number keeps growing. Please contact your City Council representatives today.

   

About last night...

The following was taken from an 11-7-19 email correspondence to Councilmember Jennifer Ide from Dr. Louisa Bond Moffitt, and is being reprinted with permission from the author: 

I attended the meeting last night at Atlanta Metropolitan College to hear the latest version of the proposal to protect Atlanta’s trees, and I have to say I was appalled. All we heard was a tedious presentation of a formula to place a value on trees so they could come down – nothing about genuine revision of city statutes to protect them from unscrupulous developers. I was told that 1.2 million dollars has been spent on this travesty so far.

There was no current study of the existing tree canopy (one committee member finally offered that there was one done in 2014 “by some people at Georgia Tech.”), no genuine penalties for developers who cut down trees at will as the fines seem negligible, no plans for any sort of enforcement, and apparently no real interest in hearing what people had to say. The committee had designed an “activity” to eat up most of the time allotted for comments – thankfully there was a general uproar to that and the people attending insisted on comment time instead. The gentleman with the “activity” sheets quickly scurried off the to the back of the room and never opened his mouth again – he left his other committee members on their own.

Those attending came from all over the city – Vine City, Summerhill, Candler Park, Inman Park, Virginia Highlands, Buckhead, downtown – it was heartening to hear such a unanimous voice of condemnation for this waste of the city’s money and the danger this foolishness has created for the quality of life in our city.

We need a clear look at what has happened in the last decade in terms of illegal and irresponsible destruction of trees, a strong enforcement code that might actually act as a deterrent, a willingness to listen to the concerns (and even the demands) of city residents involving all of this, and a plan going forward that actually addresses the issues rather than  offering window dressing and an extended free ride for developers.

The work of this “task force” is a disgrace. I would appreciate anything you might be able to do to pull the plug on this ineffectual committee and see if we might get a group together that could come up with a plan that would be worth the 1.2 million dollars we have already wasted on this effort. All we got last night was the repeated assurance, “We will take that into consideration.” Not nearly enough. 

Meanwhile, from the Urban Ecology Framework website:

Statement of 11/7/2019 meeting cancellation:

"The Department of City Planning has cancelled the Tree Ordinance Rewrite Community Meeting for November 7, 2019. Through the Advisory Committees and first round of public meetings, we discovered that the presentation and meeting format were not conducive to receiving feedback on the key concepts that were presented. We therefore chose to cancel the remaining meeting to respect everyone's time. We will be reevaluating the schedule and our approach to future engagement. Details will be provided as they become available. Please stay tuned to our website and social media channels for further information. We thank everyone for their engagement so far and apologize to anyone who may have been inconvenienced by tonight's cancellation."

uef nov19mtg - tpo v1.0-cancelled 002

   

See a tree coming down? Click here for what to do!

And click here to contact your City Council representatives and the UEF Project Team about the Tree Ordinance Rewrite.

Need to Look Up a Permit?

Click here for instructions on how to look up a tree cuting permit in Accela, the City of Atlanta's online permitting database.  If you already know how to use Accela, click here to go straight to the database.

Petition Update

Victory! Fulton County Modifies
Ponce de Leon Library Design

Kay Stephenson
Atlanta, GA

SEP 6, 2019 -- We are delighted to report that after several meetings between community members and Fulton County officials a revised plan has been submitted that preserves our beloved Oaks. Please click on the official statement below from Fulton County for more details. 

fulton country ponce de leon news release

best cookware sets blog the cookware sets blogs cookware sets blog which cookware sets cookware sets best cookware set cookware sets watersoftener reviews best watersoftener review blog top watersoftener review blog samsung chrome book which samsung chrome book best samsung chrome book espresso machine review best espresso machine reviews blogs top espresso machine reviews fish finder reviews blog fish finder reviews which blenders reviews top blenders reviews blogs blenders reviews blog best coffee machines reviews blog top coffee machines reviews coffee machines reviews best massage chair review blogs which massage reviews best baby stroller reviews blog top baby stroller reviews satılık yavru kpek ata˛ehir satılık yavru kpek maltepe satılık yavru kpek kartal kpek eğitim iftliği karaky kpek eğitim iftliği bahelievler kpek eğitim iftliği maltepe kpek eğitim iftliği kpek pansiyonu maltepe kpek pansiyonu avcılar kpek pansiyonu taksim kpek pansiyonu bebek orlu haber ergene haber pornovepornon.com hizlipornolar.org hizlisexizle.net